The Premier Silver Resource Website
Visit GoldSeek.com
Visit GoldReview.com
Visit UraniumSeek.com

Weekly Silver Eagle Giveaway!

Live Spot Silver
Silver Quote
 Bid|Ask 9.116   9.171
 Low|High 8.82   9.443
 Change -0.00   -0.04%
Nov 20, 2008 13:33:03 EST
Silver Price Forecasts
Only Weekly Silver Service
Stocks • T.A. • Portfolio
Navigation
Silver Market Articles
Silver Discussions at the Forum
Silver Company Links
Silver Market Updates
Silver & Gold Headlines
Silver Stock News
Silver Equity Quotes
Silver & Precious Metals Quotes
Last Five Articles
Silver Market Update
20 November, 2008
Gold Seeker Closing Report: Gold and Silver End Mixed While Stocks Plummet Again
19 November, 2008
Is China Ready to Buy Gold at Last?
19 November, 2008
Gold Seeker Closing Report: Gold Erases Gains To End Over 1% Lower While Silver Gains Over 2%
18 November, 2008
A Sure Thing?
18 November, 2008





Search SilverSeek.com


Search SilverSeek.com
Syndicate



 
The Silver Deficit (1942-2004)

By: David Zurbuchen


-- Posted 28 February, 2006 | Digg This ArticleDigg It! |

 

Editor of www.silverinscripture.com

Free Silver Stock Investment Newsletter

This is the 2nd installment of a planned 7-part series:

Part 1 – The World’s Cumulative Silver and Gold Production. Documenting the total amount of silver and gold produced since recorded history.

*Part 2 –The Silver Deficit. Documenting the silver supply/demand deficit since 1942.

Part 3 – The Real Silver Deficit. Answering the questions of “How much silver has been consumed by industry?” and “In what potentially marketable accessible forms does it remain?”

Part 4 – The Illogical Performance of the Gold to Silver ratio Since 1848. A look at silver and gold’s comparative production growth since 1848.

Part 5 – Why the Depressed Prices? A brief look at the amount of silver and gold stockpiles held throughout the 1900’s and the resultant pressure they placed on upward prices movements as they were liquidated.

Part 6 – What Happened in 1980? Did production increase? Did extraordinary amounts of scrap silver come to market?

Part 7 – The Future of Silver.  An overview of silver’s fundamentals, price predictions, and some intriguing price ratio comparisons between silver and other commodities.

Preface

 “Because of the long-term structural deficit in silver, stretching back to World War II, we have consumed inventories for more than 60 years.”

-Ted Butler, “The Coming Silver Bubble”

This essay will seek to prove what Mr. Butler and other silver bulls have been confidently asserting for so long, that is, the claim that silver has experienced a supply/demand deficit which stretches back all the way to 1942.

The Silver Deficit

One problem with documenting the silver deficit is that world consumption rates are almost non-existent prior to 1955, at least according to my research.  If this data is available, please bring it to my attention. 

But despite the lack of official figures, one can know to a fairly accurate degree how much ‘deficit’ has accumulated worldwide in the years prior to 1955 through the use of some comparative math.

In order to accomplish this, we must first obtain US silver consumption data.  Then, in order to determine the total world consumption of silver, we simply find what percentage of the world’s consumption the US represented.  Luckily, there happens to be a small amount of data pertaining to this subject hidden within the Minerals Yearbook dated 1932-1933.

From the Minerals Yearbook 1932-1933 (pg. 18) we discover that total world industrial and arts consumption of silver was 91.4 million ounces in 1930 and 70.1 million ounces in 1931, whereas US industrial and arts consumption of silver was 36.4 and 33.7 million ounces respectively.  Thus, US industrial and arts consumption (not including coinage) amounted to 40.1% and 48.1% of the world’s total consumption respectively, or an average of 44.1%.  But since these years coincided with the beginnings of the “Great Depression” I thought it would be wise to evaluate this ratio once more at the next earliest point in time where the appropriate data is available in order to formulate a more certain comparison.

By looking at US industrial and arts consumption from 1956-1960, we find that on average the US consumed 96.8 million ounces while the world consumed 211.7 million ounces.  Thus, the US represented 45.7% of industrial consumption during this period.  Furthermore, from Minerals Yearbook 1958 we read, “the United States Continued to account for virtually half [let’s assume 49%] of the free-world consumption of silver (excluding coinage).”  This agrees very closely with data obtained from the years 1930-1931.  I will therefore be using a median figure of 45% (note that the actual average between the 4 data points -- 40.1%, 48.1%, 45.7%, and 49%-- is 45.55%).  I have weighted the average slightly lower for the simple reason that the US appears to have consumed less of the world’s total silver supply the further back one goes into the 20th century.  Since we are concerned with the years prior to 1955, this makes good sense.

What this 45% figure means is that I will assume US industrial and arts consumption of silver represented 45% of the world’s total in all the years where only US consumption data is known, namely 1901-1954.  We can then find the estimated total world industrial consumption during these years by dividing the US consumption numbers by .45 (or 45%).

Finding the total world consumption including coinage also presented a problem due to lack of data between 1901 and 1954.  I would like to think I estimated to a fairly accurate degree, but if in fact I have not, I nevertheless remain fairly unconcerned because this value will be shown in Part 3 to be of only minor significance in the quest to obtain the true silver deficit. 

Some Important Notes Concerning the Table Shown Below*

*The importance of this information may become more apparent in Part 3 of this series when the total amount of silver consumed by industry is calculated using several methods to account for some of the ambiguity within the Minerals Yearbooks.

1901-1954: It is somewhat ambiguous whether or not world industrial and arts consumption given in the Minerals Yearbooks during this period is a measure of net consumption (i.e. demand – recycled scrap) or simply total consumption regardless of scrap supply.  In the years prior to 1955 it seems clear that at least the US numbers do represent net consumption, and using this data I have approximated net world consumption using the 45% US to World ratio obtained above*.  Net industrial demand in the words of the Minerals Yearbooks is “silver issued for industrial use minus silver returned from industrial use.”  Following 1955, US numbers still seem to describe net consumption/demand, but at the same time world consumption numbers are not at all clear.  Regarding these issues of misunderstanding, representatives of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) were unable to answer my questions.  Therefore, I will evaluate the total silver deficit in Part 3 from several different angles, making use of various combinations of the data sets.

*Approximations were only necessary through the year 1954.  In all the years following, with one exception (1994), world demand is known without having to calculate estimates based upon US consumption numbers.

1955-1984: World Consumption totals are free-world only, and are therefore underreported by an estimated 30-60+ million ounces per year based upon an annual production from communist countries of 35-55 million ounces during this period (see the year 1985 in the chart below for reference).  This is important because during this same period total world production adds the estimated production from communist countries into the total, thus explaining why in some years there appears to be no deficit at all when in reality the deficit continued (e.g. 1955 and 1981-1985).

1955-1994: As was alluded to above, total world industrial and arts consumption numbers and total world consumption numbers during this period are somewhat ambiguous, again because they could be representative of either net demand or simply total demand.  While the US consumption totals are usually identified as ‘net demand’ within the Minerals Yearbooks, it is not clear if world demand/consumption totals are meant to mean the same thing, even while the US and world totals are at times described with the exact same wording.

Ø      ‘e.’ stands for estimated

Ø      All years in RED are years in which there was a worldwide supply/demand deficit (1942-2004).

Ø      Industrial and arts consumption stands for total silver demand (i.e. photography, jewelry, electronics, etc.) minus coinage demand.

Ø      Many years have two quoted values for various calculations, one net (i.e. total demand - scrap) and the other total (i.e. not factoring in scrap supply).

Lastly, I highly recommend you read the quoted material inserted between the yearly data within the following chart.  Many gems are enclosed, I assure you of this.  One such entry mentions that the US military alone was using silver in over 5,000 different items in the year 1971!

 

Total World Silver Consumption (1901-2004)

(Reported in millions of ounces, with the exception of the totals)

 

Source: Minerals Yearbook (1901-1994)

Source: The Silver Institute (1995-2004)

 

Year(s)

World Production

US Industrial and Arts Consumption/Demand

World Industrial and Arts Consumption/Demand

Total World Consumption/Demand (w/coinage)

1901-1924 average

217.2 e.

28.0

Net121.1

62.3 e.

Net 46.9 e.

100.0 e.

1925-1929

average

261.3

39.1

Net 28.8

86.9 e.

Net 64.0 e.

125.0 e.

1930

220.0 e.

36.3

Net 26.9

80.7 e.

Net 59.8 e.

91.4

1931

195.6

33.7

Net 24.3

65.0 e.

Net 54.0 e.

70.1

1932-1941

average

234.4

49.0

Net 27.1

108.9 e.

Net 60.2 e.

121.7 e.

Pg. 59 Minerals Yearbook 1941, “The utilization of silver in the arts and industries has shown a phenomenal increase during the past few years.  Consumption has leaped from 5 million fine ounces in 1935 to some 72 million fine ounces in 1941 …Naturally, much of this increased demand is due directly or indirectly to the war program.”

 

Pg. 61 Minerals Yearbook 1941, “The stockpile [of silver] once considered to be too large, is disappearing at a rapid rate, and the metal [silver] is speedily taking its place with numerous other metals whose nonessential uses are being seriously curtailed or prohibited; not often has a commodity readjusted its position in commerce so abruptly.”

1942

249.6

121.0

Net 101.4

268.9 e.

Net 225.3 e.

280.0 e.

1943

217.0

159.0

Net 118.0

353.3 e.

Net 262.2 e.

370.0 e.

1944

186.2

Net 120.1

Net 266.9 e.

285.0 e.

1945

157.0

Net 126.3

Net 280.7 e.

300.0 e.

 

Pg. 85 Minerals Yearbook 1945 “Owing to restrictions on the international movement of gold and silver and the measures taken by governments to stabilize the exchange value of currencies, gold and silver lost much of their monetary significance.  The eagerness of individuals to acquire the metals, however, appears to have increased, particularly where the monetary regulations were the most arbitrary.”

 

Pg. 105-106 Minerals Yearbook 1945 “Monetary use has claimed by far the largest part of the gold and silver output through the years, but this use to a large extent takes the form of stock-piling in government or private hoards which are available to industry and the arts without smelter or refinery preparation.  In contrast, the gold and silver entering industry and the arts are consumed much as other metals, any return of secondary metal requiring the usual channels of collection, smelting, and refining.  The consumption of gold and silver antedates written history, but industrial use of these two metals is a recent development.”

 

1946

129.0

Net 87.0

Net 193.3 e.

220.0 e.

1947

156.8

Net 98.5

Net 218.9 e.

250.0 e.

1948

173.2

Net 105.8

Net 235.1 e.

260.0 e.

1949

173.8

Net 88.0

Net 195.6 e.

230.0 e.

1950

203.0

Net 110.0

Net 244.4 e.

275.0 e.

1951

199.1

Net 105.0

Net 233.3 e.

270.0 e.

Pg. 634 Minerals Yearbook 1951 “The industrial uses of silver have grown greatly during the war and continue to absorb much silver thereafter…”

1952

216.8

Net 96.5

Net 214.4 e.

260.0 e.

1953

216.4

Net 106.0

Net 235.6 e.

270.0 e.

1954

214.2

Net 86.0

Net 191.1 e.

230.0 e.

1955*

223.4

Net 101.4

174.6

217.4 free-world

*In case of doubt, there was indeed a deficit in this year, and the 1955 Minerals Yearbook itself states very clearly that world consumption continued to exceed world production (see below).  I strongly suspect that the apparent discrepancy arose because the world consumption numbers reported in the years 1939-1989 only include data from the free-world and do not estimate consumption in communist controlled countries, whereas reported world production numbers do include such estimates.

Pg. 1003 Minerals Yearbook 1955, “World silver consumption, including coinage, continued to exceed world production.”

 

Pg. 1013 Minerals Yearbook 1955, “Silver consumption in the United States since 1941 has exceeded any annual output ever achieved by domestic mines.

1956

222.4

Net 100.0

204.3

260.4

1957

231.1

Net 95.4

212.6

296.8

1958

239.0

Net 85.5

190.5

270.0

1959

221.9

Net 101.0

214.9

301.3

1960

240.2

Net 102.0

226.1

325.4

1961

231.8

Net 105.5

238.1

352.4

1962

242.4

Net 110.4

239.7

365.9

1963

250.8

Net 110.0

252.2

409.2

1964