The Premier Silver Resource Website
Visit GoldSeek.com
Visit GoldReview.com
Visit UraniumSeek.com

- CLICK HERE TO VISIT THE NEW SILVERSEEK.COM -
Live Spot Silver
Navigation
Silver Market Articles
Silver Discussions at the Forum
Silver Company Links
Silver Market Updates
Silver & Gold Headlines
Silver Stock News
Silver Equity Quotes
Silver & Precious Metals Quotes







 
The Tech Funds Run - Silver

By: Theodore Butler


-- Posted 6 May, 2003 | | Source: SilverSeek.com

We certainly didn't have to wait long to see how the giant computer-driven mechanical technical fund short position in COMEX silver was going to be resolved. The Commitment of Traders Report (COT), released Friday, May 2, indicated active short-covering by the tech funds. The price and volume statistics since the cutoff date, on April 29, suggests the tech funds have finished covering the bulk of their short position. The silver market's near 50 cent rally occurred precisely because the tech funds bought back their outsized short position.

My past few articles have emphasized the low risk in the silver market and the near certainty of a price rally because of the near historic short position of the mechanical tech funds. I even went so far as labeling their short position as one of the dumbest trades ever. My guess is that they lost around $40 million on this trade.

The dealers did not take advantage of the trapped funds, setting off the dormant silver volcano. Once again we have been given a clear lesson on how the silver market really works. (It's too bad the CFTC doesn't want to learn). There is a regular cycle in the silver market that you can set your watch to. When the tech funds get massively long (with the commercial dealers correspondingly short), the market always experiences a significant decline. When the funds are heavily short (dealers long), up we go. If you think I'm just talking about a reliable trading signal, you're missing my drift. It's much more than that. I'm talking about illegal control of a market.

The very premise of our futures markets is that prices should be set in the real world of supply and demand, and not be determined by speculation on futures markets. It should be clear that the exact opposite has occurred. The worldwide price of silver is set only by speculation on the COMEX. You only need look at this last price rally in silver for confirmation. There was no outwardly bullish fundamental news, only supposedly "bearish" news (such as declines in photo usage due to the SARS-related travel slump in Asia and the reports of a declining deficit). Yet silver experienced a spirited rally. A reasonable observer would conclude that the sudden purchase of some 20,000 short COMEX contracts (100 million ounces) by the technical funds was the obvious cause of the price rally. How the CFTC has allowed the silver (and other) market(s) to be taken hostage by a small group of technical funds and an even smaller group of speculating dealers is one of the great regulatory failures of our day.

So where do we stand currently, with regard to the COT market structure in COMEX silver? Well, we're certainly not where we were a few weeks ago. We've lost the certainty of low risk and a coming rally, based on the tech funds' short position. It's possible, to experience lower prices if the dealers engineer the tech funds back into a full short position. That's the bad news. The good news is that the tech funds have not built up a massive long position (yet). So, we’re not bearish. We're neutral in COT terms. It could easily turn out that this tech fund short-covering rally could serve as a first stage, booster rocket on a long-term upward price trajectory. The key might be whether the tech funds are allowed to get a big long position. The controlling dealers may permit the price of silver to go high enough to prevent the tech funds from building a big long position. The dealers have a copy of the tech funds' play book, and the dealers know the funds won't buy if the price is too far above the moving averages. That could portend a rapidly rising market.

Indeed, there are other signs of encouragement in the current COT. For the first time in my memory, both large and small speculators liquidated long positions on the rally. Apart from this being different from past speculative behavior (and I confess to always being on the lookout for possible changes in the decades-long pattern of control), it suggests less potential long liquidation on price weakness.

Outside the COT, I couldn't help notice that we rallied strongly (25 cents) in the three days commencing with first notice of delivery day of the big May COMEX contract. While there has always been a pattern of the controlling dealers swapping (issuing and stopping) large quantities of COMEX warehouse receipts on first notice day, this time they outdid themselves, with regular dealer kingpin AIG issuing over 99% of the first notice day's 17.5 million ounces. How is it possible that one entity could legitimately deliver such a large percentage of a freely traded commodity? One of these days, maybe the CFTC will get around to checking whether these dealers are really involved in economic transactions in these silver delivery daisy-chain games. Or is it just a case of these dealers making it look like plenty of real silver is available? This is a modern day, financial Potemkin Village.

It's important to keep my COT and COMEX-related comments in perspective. As I've indicated in the past, when the tech funds are short big, like they were a few weeks ago, then buying silver is like shooting fish in a barrel - it's hard to miss. When the tech funds are long big (not now), some caution in aggressive buying is advised. But, remember, my only public recommendation has been to buy real silver with no leverage, or margin. In no way would a negative COT (if it comes) warrant the sale of physical silver, especially if we're still stuck around $5. Let's face it - it is real supply and demand and the structural deficit in silver that matters the most. It is this deficit that guarantees the price of silver must move substantially higher.


-- Posted 6 May, 2003 | |



This article is brought to you in part by Investment Rarities Inc.

 

Last Three Articles by Theodore Butler


Warnings Ignored
4 September, 2009

The Voice Of The People
25 August, 2009

Walking the Walk
20 August, 2009

Ted Butler - Article Archive List

SilverSeek.com is presented to you by:

© 2003 - 2011
SilverSeek.com, Silver Seek LLC

The content on this site is protected by U.S. and international copyright laws and is the property of SilverSeek.com and/or the providers of the content under license. By "content" we mean any information, mode of expression, or other materials and services found on SilverSeek.com. This includes editorials, news, our writings, graphics, and any and all other features found on the site. Please contact us for any further information.

Disclaimer

The views contained here may not represent the views of SilverSeek.com, its affiliates or advertisers. SilverSeek.com makes no representation, warranty or guarantee as to the accuracy or completeness of the information (including news, editorials, prices, statistics, analyses and the like) provided through its service. Any copying, reproduction and/or redistribution of any of the documents, data, content or materials contained on or within this website, without the express written consent of SilverSeek.com, is strictly prohibited. In no event shall SilverSeek.com or its affiliates be liable to any person for any decision made or action taken in reliance upon the information provided herein.